Github user ChengXiangLi commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/1255#discussion_r46792344
--- Diff:
flink-optimizer/src/main/java/org/apache/flink/optimizer/traversals/RangePartitionRewriter.java
---
@@ -0,0 +1,194 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one
+ * or more contributor license agreements. See the NOTICE file
+ * distributed with this work for additional information
+ * regarding copyright ownership. The ASF licenses this file
+ * to you under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the
+ * "License"); you may not use this file except in compliance
+ * with the License. You may obtain a copy of the License at
+ *
+ * http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
+ *
+ * Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software
+ * distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS,
+ * WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied.
+ * See the License for the specific language governing permissions and
+ * limitations under the License.
+ */
+package org.apache.flink.optimizer.traversals;
+
+import org.apache.flink.api.common.distributions.CommonRangeBoundaries;
+import org.apache.flink.api.common.operators.UnaryOperatorInformation;
+import org.apache.flink.api.common.operators.base.GroupReduceOperatorBase;
+import org.apache.flink.api.common.operators.base.MapOperatorBase;
+import org.apache.flink.api.common.operators.base.MapPartitionOperatorBase;
+import org.apache.flink.api.common.operators.util.FieldList;
+import org.apache.flink.api.common.typeinfo.BasicTypeInfo;
+import org.apache.flink.api.common.typeinfo.TypeInformation;
+import org.apache.flink.api.common.typeutils.TypeComparatorFactory;
+import org.apache.flink.api.java.typeutils.RecordTypeInfo;
+import org.apache.flink.runtime.io.network.DataExchangeMode;
+import org.apache.flink.runtime.operators.udf.AssignRangeIndex;
+import org.apache.flink.runtime.operators.udf.PartitionIDRemoveWrapper;
+import org.apache.flink.runtime.operators.udf.RangeBoundaryBuilder;
+import org.apache.flink.api.java.functions.SampleInCoordinator;
+import org.apache.flink.api.java.functions.SampleInPartition;
+import org.apache.flink.api.java.sampling.IntermediateSampleData;
+import org.apache.flink.api.java.tuple.Tuple2;
+import org.apache.flink.api.java.typeutils.TupleTypeInfo;
+import org.apache.flink.api.java.typeutils.TypeExtractor;
+import org.apache.flink.optimizer.dag.GroupReduceNode;
+import org.apache.flink.optimizer.dag.MapNode;
+import org.apache.flink.optimizer.dag.MapPartitionNode;
+import org.apache.flink.optimizer.dag.TempMode;
+import org.apache.flink.optimizer.plan.Channel;
+import org.apache.flink.optimizer.plan.NamedChannel;
+import org.apache.flink.optimizer.plan.OptimizedPlan;
+import org.apache.flink.optimizer.plan.PlanNode;
+import org.apache.flink.optimizer.plan.SingleInputPlanNode;
+import org.apache.flink.optimizer.util.Utils;
+import org.apache.flink.runtime.operators.DriverStrategy;
+import org.apache.flink.runtime.operators.shipping.ShipStrategyType;
+import org.apache.flink.util.Visitor;
+
+import java.util.ArrayList;
+import java.util.LinkedList;
+import java.util.List;
+
+public class RangePartitionRewriter implements Visitor<PlanNode> {
+ final static long SEED = org.apache.flink.api.java.Utils.RNG.nextLong();
+
+ final OptimizedPlan plan;
+
+ public RangePartitionRewriter(OptimizedPlan plan) {
+ this.plan = plan;
+ }
+
+ @Override
+ public boolean preVisit(PlanNode visitable) {
+ return true;
+ }
+
+ @Override
+ public void postVisit(PlanNode visitable) {
+ final List<Channel> outgoingChannels =
visitable.getOutgoingChannels();
+ final List<Channel> newOutGoingChannels = new LinkedList<>();
+ final List<Channel> toBeRemoveChannels = new ArrayList<>();
+ for (Channel channel : outgoingChannels) {
+ ShipStrategyType shipStrategy =
channel.getShipStrategy();
+ if (shipStrategy == ShipStrategyType.PARTITION_RANGE) {
+ TypeInformation<?> outputType =
channel.getSource().getProgramOperator().getOperatorInfo().getOutputType();
+ // Do not optimize for record type, it's a
special case for range partitioner, and should be removed later.
+ if (!(outputType instanceof RecordTypeInfo)) {
--- End diff --
Thanks for the remind, @fhueske , I've added verification on
`PartitionOperator` level and related unit test. BTW, would the `Record` type
be fully discarded finally? it seems been broken on many features, but there
are still lots of related code remain in Flink.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---
