Github user tillrohrmann commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/1227#issuecomment-145810928 Good PR @uce. I think the proposal in your description to let the client-side (TMs) 1. check whether they have the file cached, 2. check the filesystem backend and 3. (this case should then never happen in recovery mode) ask the JM, in order to obtain the required Jars would be a good improvement. Currently, I've got the feeling that the file state backend is too tightly coupled with the `BlobServer`. IMHO, it would be better to add an abstraction so that the effective backend to distribute the Jars can be easily swapped. Furthermore, I couldn't find a check whether the user provided `STATE_BACKEND_FS_RECOVERY_PATH` path points actually to a distributed file system and is, thus, accessible by the TMs. Maybe we could add a check which, if false, will give a comprehensive warning.
--- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket with INFRA. ---