pnowojski commented on a change in pull request #8811: [FLINK-12777][network] Support CheckpointBarrierHandler in StreamTwoInputSelectableProcessor URL: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/8811#discussion_r298540216
########## File path: flink-streaming-java/src/main/java/org/apache/flink/streaming/runtime/io/LinkedBufferStorage.java ########## @@ -0,0 +1,104 @@ +/* + * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one + * or more contributor license agreements. See the NOTICE file + * distributed with this work for additional information + * regarding copyright ownership. The ASF licenses this file + * to you under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the + * "License"); you may not use this file except in compliance + * with the License. You may obtain a copy of the License at + * + * http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0 + * + * Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software + * distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS, + * WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied. + * See the License for the specific language governing permissions and + * limitations under the License. + */ + +package org.apache.flink.streaming.runtime.io; + +import org.apache.flink.runtime.io.network.partition.consumer.BufferOrEvent; +import org.apache.flink.util.ExceptionUtils; + +import java.io.IOException; +import java.util.Optional; + +/** + * Implementation of {@link BufferStorage} that links two {@link BufferStorage} together. + * Each of the linked {@link BufferStorage} will store buffers independently, but they will be + * linked together for {@link #rollOver()} - if one is rolled over, other will do that as well. + */ +public class LinkedBufferStorage implements BufferStorage { Review comment: I see your point. I think java doc above the class explains this: > Each of the linked {@link BufferStorage} will store buffers independently which is not ideal (self documenting code > comments), but as we don't have a better proposal, I will leave it as it is. If someone will come up with a better name in the future, it's always easy to rename internal classes. ---------------------------------------------------------------- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org With regards, Apache Git Services
