Github user twalthr commented on a diff in the pull request:

    https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/6120#discussion_r203083498
  
    --- Diff: 
flink-core/src/test/java/org/apache/flink/api/java/typeutils/LambdaExtractionTest.java
 ---
    @@ -271,19 +214,20 @@ public void testKeySelectorLambda() {
        public void testLambdaTypeErasure() {
                MapFunction<Tuple1<Integer>, Tuple1> f = (i) -> null;
                TypeInformation<?> ti = TypeExtractor.getMapReturnTypes(f, new 
TypeHint<Tuple1<Integer>>(){}.getTypeInfo(), null, true);
    -           Assert.assertTrue(ti instanceof MissingTypeInfo);
    +           assertTrue(ti instanceof MissingTypeInfo);
        }
     
        @Test
        public void testPartitionerLambda() {
                Partitioner<Tuple2<Integer, String>> partitioner = (key, 
numPartitions) -> key.f1.length() % numPartitions;
    -           final TypeInformation<?> ti = 
TypeExtractor.getPartitionerTypes(partitioner);
    -
    -           Assert.assertTrue(ti.isTupleType());
    -           Assert.assertEquals(2, ti.getArity());
    -           Assert.assertEquals(((TupleTypeInfo<?>) ti).getTypeAt(0), 
BasicTypeInfo.INT_TYPE_INFO);
    -           Assert.assertEquals(((TupleTypeInfo<?>) ti).getTypeAt(1), 
BasicTypeInfo.STRING_TYPE_INFO);
    +           final TypeInformation<?> ti = 
TypeExtractor.getPartitionerTypes(partitioner, null, true);
     
    +           if (!(ti instanceof MissingTypeInfo)) {
    --- End diff --
    
    In case a compiler adds generics, this case would be activated. Otherwise 
testing for `MissingTypInfo` is correct.


---

Reply via email to