[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-7416?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16201566#comment-16201566
 ] 

ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-7416:
---------------------------------------

Github user pnowojski commented on a diff in the pull request:

    https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/4533#discussion_r144214324
  
    --- Diff: 
flink-runtime/src/main/java/org/apache/flink/runtime/io/network/netty/CreditBasedClientHandler.java
 ---
    @@ -272,4 +316,53 @@ private void decodeBufferOrEvent(RemoteInputChannel 
inputChannel, NettyMessage.B
                        bufferOrEvent.releaseBuffer();
                }
        }
    +
    +   private void writeAndFlushNextMessageIfPossible(Channel channel) {
    +           if (channelError.get() != null) {
    +                   return;
    +           }
    +
    +           if (channel.isWritable()) {
    --- End diff --
    
    Sorry, I could be more clear :) I meant that shorter of the if/else branch 
should go first for readability. Here instead of:
    ```
    if (channel.isWritable()) {
        // long
        // block
        {
            // of
            {
                // nested
                // code
            }
        }
    }
    ```
    you could have:
    ```
    if (!channel.isWritable()) {
        return;
    }
    // long
    // block
    {
        // of
        {
            // nested
            // code
        }
    }
    }
    ```
    which is easier to understand because reader immediately knows that one of 
the branch is super simple and code doesn't nest that deeply.


> Implement Netty receiver outgoing pipeline for credit-based
> -----------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: FLINK-7416
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-7416
>             Project: Flink
>          Issue Type: Sub-task
>          Components: Network
>            Reporter: zhijiang
>            Assignee: zhijiang
>             Fix For: 1.4.0
>
>
> This is a part of work for credit-based network flow control.
> The related works are :
> *  We define a new message called {{AddCredit}} to notify the incremental 
> credit during data shuffle. 
> * Whenever an {{InputChannel}}’s unannounced credit goes up from zero, the 
> channel is enqueued in the pipeline.
> * Whenever the channel becomes writable, it takes the next {{InputChannel}} 
> and sends its unannounced credit. The credit is reset to zero after each sent.
> * That way, messages are sent as often as the network has capacity and 
> contain as much credit as available for the channel at that point in time. 
> Otherwise, it would only add latency to the announcements and not increase 
> throughput.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)

Reply via email to