[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-7337?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16117029#comment-16117029 ]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-7337: --------------------------------------- Github user twalthr commented on a diff in the pull request: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/4488#discussion_r131703254 --- Diff: flink-libraries/flink-table/src/main/scala/org/apache/flink/table/api/StreamTableEnvironment.scala --- @@ -677,12 +748,43 @@ abstract class StreamTableEnvironment( val rootParallelism = plan.getParallelism - conversion match { - case mapFunction: MapFunction[CRow, A] => - plan.map(mapFunction) - .returns(tpe) - .name(s"to: ${tpe.getTypeClass.getSimpleName}") - .setParallelism(rootParallelism) + val rowtimeFields = logicalType.getFieldList.asScala + .filter(f => FlinkTypeFactory.isRowtimeIndicatorType(f.getType)) + + if (rowtimeFields.isEmpty) { + // to rowtime field to set --- End diff -- typo? > Refactor handling of time indicator attributes > ---------------------------------------------- > > Key: FLINK-7337 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-7337 > Project: Flink > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: Table API & SQL > Affects Versions: 1.4.0 > Reporter: Fabian Hueske > Assignee: Fabian Hueske > > After a [discussion on the dev mailing > list|https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/735d55f9022df8ff73566a9f1553e14be94f8443986ad46559b35869@%3Cdev.flink.apache.org%3E] > I propose the following changes to the current handling of time indicator > attributes: > * Remove the separation of logical and physical row type. > ** Hold the event-time timestamp as regular Long field in Row > ** Represent the processing-time indicator type as a null-valued field in Row > (1 bit overhead) > * Remove materialization of event-time timestamps because timestamp is > already accessible in Row. > * Add {{ProcessFunction}} to set timestamp into the timestamp field of a > {{StreamRecord}}. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.4.14#64029)