[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CXF-6869?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15245378#comment-15245378 ]
Sergey Beryozkin commented on CXF-6869: --------------------------------------- Hi, sure how about integration/spring-boot being a parent directory containing /autoconfigure (cxf-spring-boot-autoconfigure) /starter (cxf-spring-boot-starter) ? By the way I've read in their docs it could be a single module combining the auto-configuration and the starter features. Would it make sense to combine or it is better to keep it separate ? > Consider adding Spring Boot starter > ----------------------------------- > > Key: CXF-6869 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CXF-6869 > Project: CXF > Issue Type: New Feature > Components: Integration > Reporter: Vedran Pavic > > I've recently authored a PR in Spring Boot to add support for > auto-configuration of {{CXFServlet}} and default CXF's configuration: > https://github.com/spring-projects/spring-boot/pull/5659 > The PR was closed with "won't fix" resolution since Boot team are unwilling > to add CXF as a dependency to the project. Instead a 3rd party starter was > suggested. > The concept of a 3rd party starter is generally encouraged for technologies > that don't have first-class support in projects from Spring portfolio. Such > 3rd party starters are listed here: > https://github.com/spring-projects/spring-boot/blob/master/spring-boot-starters/README.adoc > If CXF team is interested, I'm willing to port my PR to CXF. > Note that the original PR was focused around JAX-WS support, but can be > easily expanded to include JAX-RS support as well. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)