[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CXF-6869?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15245240#comment-15245240
 ] 

Vedran Pavic commented on CXF-6869:
-----------------------------------

Sergey, I'll be glad port it.
Hopefully will be able to fit that to my schedule within the next week or two.

Since this will result in a new CXF artifact(s), I need you to point me to 
place where to put my code.
At first look, it looks to be a fit under integration modules.

Artifacts should be named with respect to Spring Boot's guidelines for 3rd 
party starters:
http://docs.spring.io/spring-boot/docs/current/reference/htmlsingle/#boot-features-custom-starter

Assuming the integration assumption from above was correct, the modules would 
be named {{cxf-integration-spring-boot-autoconfigure}} and 
{{cxf-integration-spring-boot-starter}}. Would it be possible to omit the 
{{integration}} part?
Regarding sample application, I've seen your already have a space for that.

> Consider adding Spring Boot starter
> -----------------------------------
>
>                 Key: CXF-6869
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CXF-6869
>             Project: CXF
>          Issue Type: New Feature
>          Components: Integration
>            Reporter: Vedran Pavic
>
> I've recently authored a PR in Spring Boot to add support for 
> auto-configuration of {{CXFServlet}} and default CXF's configuration:
> https://github.com/spring-projects/spring-boot/pull/5659
> The PR was closed with "won't fix" resolution since Boot team are unwilling 
> to add CXF as a dependency to the project. Instead a 3rd party starter was 
> suggested.
> The concept of a 3rd party starter is generally encouraged for technologies 
> that don't have first-class support in projects from Spring portfolio. Such 
> 3rd party starters are listed here:
> https://github.com/spring-projects/spring-boot/blob/master/spring-boot-starters/README.adoc
> If CXF team is interested, I'm willing to port my PR to CXF.
> Note that the original PR was focused around JAX-WS support, but can be 
> easily expanded to include JAX-RS support as well.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to