[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CXF-6237?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14304162#comment-14304162
 ] 

moshiko kasirer commented on CXF-6237:
--------------------------------------

"as I mentioned a couple of reasons why CXF may be working with OpenSaml
2.6.1 and XmlSec 2.0.2."
This is what I don't get with all the rest I agree. Except using different
code flow are there any more options on why you don't see what I see?
As for xmlsec let's say it's their issue where should I open a defect?



> CXF 3.0.3 rt-security has problems working with latest open saml version 
> (2.6.1)
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: CXF-6237
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CXF-6237
>             Project: CXF
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: JAX-RS Security, WS-* Components
>    Affects Versions: 3.0.3
>            Reporter: moshiko kasirer
>            Assignee: Colm O hEigeartaigh
>
> Hi, 
> CXF-rt-ws-security 3.0.3 is working with wss4j of version: 
> <cxf.wss4j.version>2.0.2</cxf.wss4j.version>
> an xmlsec version of version:
> <cxf.xmlsec.bundle.version>2.0.2</cxf.xmlsec.bundle.version>
> and open SAML of version:
> <cxf.opensaml.version>2.6.1</cxf.opensaml.version>
> that is problematic as from one hand CXF 3.0.3 is dependent on XMLSEC version 
> 2.*+ and throws multiple no method exist exceptions when working with 1.5.5*  
> XMLSEC versions
> and on the other hand the latest open SAML which is the CXF open saml version 
> (2.6.1) fails on validating the SAML token when working with XMLSEC version 
> 2.*
> so actually when working with both CXF 3 and OPEN SAML 2.6.1 
> this will happen 
> when working with xmlsec 1.5.*  OPEN SAML works CXF fails   
> when working with xmlsec 2.0.*  CXF works OPEN SAML fails...
> you can see under open saml 2.6.1 that it holds xmlsec version 1.5.6 which is 
> overrided by CXF and wss4j (2.0.2)
> can you please help me figure out a way to overcome this issue?



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to