[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CXF-6237?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14303975#comment-14303975
 ] 

moshiko kasirer commented on CXF-6237:
--------------------------------------

Already tried not that easy to do on that complicated chain. I don't know
where to put the break points in xmlsec... in addition it will not help me
to find the problem as open saml is not updated on regular bases....
Is it possible you run your open saml test with osgi making him work with
xmlsec 1.5.6?



> CXF 3.0.3 rt-security has problems working with latest open saml version 
> (2.6.1)
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: CXF-6237
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CXF-6237
>             Project: CXF
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: JAX-RS Security, WS-* Components
>    Affects Versions: 3.0.3
>            Reporter: moshiko kasirer
>            Assignee: Colm O hEigeartaigh
>
> Hi, 
> CXF-rt-ws-security 3.0.3 is working with wss4j of version: 
> <cxf.wss4j.version>2.0.2</cxf.wss4j.version>
> an xmlsec version of version:
> <cxf.xmlsec.bundle.version>2.0.2</cxf.xmlsec.bundle.version>
> and open SAML of version:
> <cxf.opensaml.version>2.6.1</cxf.opensaml.version>
> that is problematic as from one hand CXF 3.0.3 is dependent on XMLSEC version 
> 2.*+ and throws multiple no method exist exceptions when working with 1.5.5*  
> XMLSEC versions
> and on the other hand the latest open SAML which is the CXF open saml version 
> (2.6.1) fails on validating the SAML token when working with XMLSEC version 
> 2.*
> so actually when working with both CXF 3 and OPEN SAML 2.6.1 
> this will happen 
> when working with xmlsec 1.5.*  OPEN SAML works CXF fails   
> when working with xmlsec 2.0.*  CXF works OPEN SAML fails...
> you can see under open saml 2.6.1 that it holds xmlsec version 1.5.6 which is 
> overrided by CXF and wss4j (2.0.2)
> can you please help me figure out a way to overcome this issue?



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to