[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COMPRESS-416?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16072647#comment-16072647
 ] 

Simon Spero commented on COMPRESS-416:
--------------------------------------

It's an oracle issue. 

{code:java}
    @Test
    public void testJUZTimes() throws Exception {
        final File archive = getFile("COMPRESS-210_unix_time_zip_test.zip");
        try (java.util.zip.ZipFile zf = new java.util.zip.ZipFile(archive)) {
          ZipEntry entry =  zf.getEntry("COMPRESS-210_unix_time_zip_test/2105");
            Calendar girl = Calendar.getInstance(TimeZone.getTimeZone("GMT"));
            girl.setTime(new Date(entry.getTime()));
            int year = girl.get(Calendar.YEAR);
            assertEquals(2105,year);
        }
    }
{code}

java.lang.AssertionError: 
Expected :2105
Actual   :1968  

1968-11-24T00:00:00.000Z to be precise.   So I'm weeks away from being 
conceived, and the  Nixon transition team is busy picking out hidden tape 
recorders.


> Tests failing under jdk 9 : one reflection issue, one change to ZipEntry 
> related issue
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: COMPRESS-416
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COMPRESS-416
>             Project: Commons Compress
>          Issue Type: Bug
>    Affects Versions: 1.14, 1.15
>         Environment: JDK 9 ( jdk9 tree tip - I believe this is what will be 
> the RC, or if not, what would have been RC). 
>     java.runtime.version = 9-internal+0-adhoc.ses.jdk9
>     java.specification.version = 9
>     java.version = 9-internal
>     java.vm.specification.version = 9
>     os.arch = amd64
>     os.name = Linux
>     os.version = 4.4.0-81-generic
>            Reporter: Simon Spero
>             Fix For: 1.15
>
>         Attachments: surefire-reports.zip
>
>
> X5455_ExtendedTimestampTest is failing under JDK 9 , due to what appears to 
> be a bogus value returned from getTime().  It seems like the test failure 
> might be due to the changes introduced for this: 
> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8073497
> Tests were run using intelliJ TestRunner, using the openjdk9 build from the 
> tip of the jdk9 tree (not dev).  I believe that this is at most one commit 
> away from what will be the RC (which was delayed at the last minute due to 
> two issues, one of which was javadoc related, and the other hotspot. 



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)

Reply via email to