[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-2582?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16624057#comment-16624057
 ] 

Vladimir Sitnikov commented on CALCITE-2582:
--------------------------------------------

{quote}They will use whatever factory is current. Do you see a problem with 
that?{quote}
It might be a good idea to introduce stacks for "current" factories.

For instance, 
{{org.apache.calcite.tools.RelBuilder#join(org.apache.calcite.rel.core.JoinRelType,
 org.apache.calcite.rex.RexNode, 
java.util.Set<org.apache.calcite.rel.core.CorrelationId>)}} has 
filter/createCorrelate/createJoin inside.

I'm not sure `copying(...)` would help for `#join` case.

> FilterProjectTransposeRule does not always simplify the new filter condition
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: CALCITE-2582
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-2582
>             Project: Calcite
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: core
>    Affects Versions: 1.17.0
>            Reporter: Stamatis Zampetakis
>            Assignee: Julian Hyde
>            Priority: Minor
>             Fix For: 1.18.0
>
>
> After pushing the filter below the project a new condition is going to be 
> generated along with a new Filter operator. The new condition is not going to 
> be simplified if the filter operator is copied and not created using the 
> RelBuilder. 
> Thus the resulting plan may contain redundant conditions which can have a 
> slight impact on performance. Apart, from that tests verifying the resulting 
> (logical/physical) plan may produce indeterministic results if the rule is 
> applied with (a different order and in combination with other rules). 



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)

Reply via email to