ack > -----Original Message----- > From: Brian E Carpenter [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Tuesday, August 13, 2013 5:09 PM > To: Ronald Bonica > Cc: [email protected] > Subject: Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-6man-oversized-header-chain-04.txt > > On 14/08/2013 09:01, Ronald Bonica wrote: > > Brian, > > > > Good point. I will add MIPv6, Shim6 and 2 for experimental use in the > next version. > > And HIP. > > > But is "No Next Header" really a header? For the purposes of this > document, I don't think that it is. > > I agree (and that is why I took it out of the list in ext-transmit. > > Brian > > > Ron > > > > > >> -----Original Message----- > >> From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf > >> Of Brian E Carpenter > >> Sent: Tuesday, August 13, 2013 4:51 PM > >> To: [email protected] > >> Subject: Re: I-D Action: > >> draft-ietf-6man-oversized-header-chain-04.txt > >> > >>> Currently, six extension header types are defined. [RFC2460] > >> Not true. Please see Section 4 of draft-ietf-6man-ext-transmit for a > >> complete list including references. I make it eleven, if you include > >> experimental values, without counting "No Next Header". > >> > >> Regards > >> > >> Brian > >> -------------------------------------------------------------------- > >> IETF IPv6 working group mailing list > >> [email protected] > >> Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 > >> -------------------------------------------------------------------- > >> > > > > > > >
-------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list [email protected] Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------
