On 14/08/2013 09:01, Ronald Bonica wrote: > Brian, > > Good point. I will add MIPv6, Shim6 and 2 for experimental use in the next > version.
And HIP. > But is "No Next Header" really a header? For the purposes of this document, I > don't think that it is. I agree (and that is why I took it out of the list in ext-transmit. Brian > Ron > > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of >> Brian E Carpenter >> Sent: Tuesday, August 13, 2013 4:51 PM >> To: [email protected] >> Subject: Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-6man-oversized-header-chain-04.txt >> >>> Currently, six extension header types are defined. [RFC2460] >> Not true. Please see Section 4 of draft-ietf-6man-ext-transmit for a >> complete list including references. I make it eleven, if you include >> experimental values, without counting "No Next Header". >> >> Regards >> >> Brian >> -------------------------------------------------------------------- >> IETF IPv6 working group mailing list >> [email protected] >> Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 >> -------------------------------------------------------------------- >> > > > -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list [email protected] Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------
