Hi Mark,

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Mark Andrews [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: Tuesday, August 06, 2013 7:32 PM
> To: Templin, Fred L
> Cc: Doug Barton; [email protected]
> Subject: Re: UDP+Fragmentation
> 
> 
> In message <2134F8430051B64F815C691A62D983180E0E2C@XCH-BLV-
> 504.nw.nos.boeing.com>, "Templin, Fred L" writes:
> > > On 08/06/2013 03:07 PM, Templin, Fred L wrote:
> > > > If we are going to define a new protocol type, let's define one
> > > > that addresses everything we are currently struggling with and
> > > > has the extensibility to address additional requirements moving
> > > > forward into the future.
> > >
> > > So in other words let's make all the same mistakes we made with the
> > > design of IPv6?  :)
> >
> > Not even. This is about fixing and atoning for mistakes; not
> > introducing new ones.
> >
> > Thanks - Fred
> > [email protected]
> > --------------------------------------------------------------------
> > IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
> > --------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> There are several issues with getting fragments through firewalls.
> My draft addresses one of them.
> 
> Putting all the headers into the initial fragment is another part
> of fix / reducing the issue.  If you don't do something like that
> firewall will drop initial fragments because that can't be expected
> to reassemble unless they are doing DPI.
> 
> Making fragment sizes more even is yet another part of the issue.
> 
> Allowing tunnel entry points to re-fragment fragments is yet another
> part of the solution space.

In these points, you are making a good case for SEAL.

Thanks - Fred
[email protected]

> Mark
> --
> Mark Andrews, ISC
> 1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia
> PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742                 INTERNET: [email protected]
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
[email protected]
Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
--------------------------------------------------------------------

Reply via email to