> On 08/06/2013 03:07 PM, Templin, Fred L wrote: > > If we are going to define a new protocol type, let's define one > > that addresses everything we are currently struggling with and > > has the extensibility to address additional requirements moving > > forward into the future. > > So in other words let's make all the same mistakes we made with the > design of IPv6? :)
Not even. This is about fixing and atoning for mistakes; not introducing new ones. Thanks - Fred [email protected] -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list [email protected] Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------
