My major concerns were addressed (I had some optional suggestions that weren't - however, they were explicitly listed as optional, and so that's not an issue)
> -----Original Message----- > From: Tero Kivinen <kivi...@iki.fi> > Sent: Wednesday, January 8, 2025 6:24 PM > To: ipsec@ietf.org > Subject: [IPsec] WGLC of draft-ietf-ipsecme-ikev2-qr-alt > > I was looking that mailing list discussion about the WGLC of the draft-ietf- > ipsecme-ikev2-qr-alt and there were several people who commented about > this draft and Valery answered to them, but I did not get comments back from > those who made those comments whether they think that their comments > have been properly addressed. Also there has been very little support for this > draft. > > So I would like to get confirmation from those who have sent comments > during the WGLC, that the current draft addresses their issues, and if not > what > open issues there still are. I would also like to get more show of support > whether we should forward this document to the IESG. > -- > kivi...@iki.fi > > _______________________________________________ > IPsec mailing list -- ipsec@ietf.org > To unsubscribe send an email to ipsec-le...@ietf.org _______________________________________________ IPsec mailing list -- ipsec@ietf.org To unsubscribe send an email to ipsec-le...@ietf.org
