Deb Cooley writes: > (to loop in Yoav) > > Tero, > > I see a message on 3 Dec, which declares the charter draft complete. Then > there were 3-4 comments to that message (I have not read them in detail, so > I'm not pushing you either to include or not). Can you confirm that your > draft charter needs no updates to the 3 Dec version?
There were some questions whether the EESP/ESPv4 is going to be general purpose thing (i.e., people would move from ESPv3 to ESPv4), or limited thing. As we have not decided that, it is better to leave the charter open in that sense, and say that we may update old protocols or create a new one. Rebecca Guthrie sent some editorial nits, which can be done, and I have a feeling that IESG might have even more :-) I think the PQC section we have in the charter is already good enough, and we do not need to modify it based on Rebecca's comments. We alread discussed about the other PQC work (larger payloads etc) during the chartering and thats why we added the last sentense there. (The email came so much after my deadline that did not read it properly until now). -- kivi...@iki.fi _______________________________________________ IPsec mailing list -- ipsec@ietf.org To unsubscribe send an email to ipsec-le...@ietf.org
