Hi, > We are now done with the WGLC draft-ietf-ipsecme-ikev2-rename-esn. I think > there were few comments from Paul that at least caused changes to the draft, > so after we get updated draft I can send it to the IESG.
before issuing a new version, I'd like to get more feedback from the community about the point that Steffen raised - how to name "protection against replays" in the draft. Steffen raised a concern, that the current form "anti-replay protection" is not good and can confuse readers. RFC 4301-4304 uses various forms: - anti-replay service - anti-replay mechanism - anti-replay feature - anti-replay protection - anti-replay (as a noun) Other RFCs that may be relevant, use different forms: - RFC 9147 (DTLS) - replay protection - RFC 9001 (QUIC) - replay protection So, my question: what term should we use to be aligned with RFC 4301-4303 and to not confuse readers? Perhaps this is a bikeshedding, but an important one. And currently G-IKEv2 draft also uses the term "anti-replay protection", thus, if we change this term for this draft, we need to update G-IKEv2 too. Regards, Valery. > -- > kivi...@iki.fi > > _______________________________________________ > IPsec mailing list -- ipsec@ietf.org > To unsubscribe send an email to ipsec-le...@ietf.org _______________________________________________ IPsec mailing list -- ipsec@ietf.org To unsubscribe send an email to ipsec-le...@ietf.org
