Scott Fluhrer \(sfluhrer\) writes: > I (and I don’t believe I am alone in this) would like to see an > ML-KEM RFC for IKE; how can we make it happen? > > From what I see, the next step (now that the authors have updated it > to specify the final version of ML-KEM) would be having it adopted > by the working group (and while there are a number of steps past > that, I don’t know if those can proceed before this initial step).
So if people think the current draft is ready and it refers for the FIPS for the description of the algorithm, I think we can simply issue WG adoption call. The charter already include working on the postquantum cryptography, so we should be fine. > Is this something that can be done before Dublin? Yes. I can issue WG adoption call soon if people think it would be good idea. -- kivi...@iki.fi _______________________________________________ IPsec mailing list -- ipsec@ietf.org To unsubscribe send an email to ipsec-le...@ietf.org
