Linda Dunbar writes: > Could we have a 10-minute slot at the IETF120 IPsecME session to > present > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-dunbar-secdispatch-ligthtweight-authenticate/ > ?
I was pointed out that you already are in the agenda for alldispatch and alldispatch wiki says [1]: ALLDISPATCH topics MUST NOT also be on the agenda of a WG meeting at IETF, unless the topic is directly dispatched to that WG in the session. The IESG asks working group chairs to ensure that this is so. [1] https://wiki.ietf.org/en/group/alldispatch And as we already have too many presentations in the IPsecME agenda now, I will be pulling your persentation out. My understanding is that what you are doing will not be actual IPsec, but you want to reuse some parts of IPsec, thus it would not be in the IPsecME charter to work on that anyways. > The discussion on the mailing list has convinced us of the benefits > of describing the background and the proposed mechanism, as well as > obtaining more valuable feedback. On the other hand I do think IPsecME can give feedback what would be the suitable way to use IPsec (or more likely IKE) to generate keys for the method you use. (My own persional opinion would be to use SK_d (generated for generating other keys) in similar manner than 2.17 of RFC7296 generates KEYMAT, but with different inputs to make it unique for each use). -- kivi...@iki.fi _______________________________________________ IPsec mailing list -- ipsec@ietf.org To unsubscribe send an email to ipsec-le...@ietf.org
