Might I ask "what problem are you attempting to solve"? While what you're suggesting *might* be safe, I can't help but feel that there's a cleaner solution out there...
> -----Original Message----- > From: Linda Dunbar <linda.dun...@futurewei.com> > Sent: Wednesday, July 10, 2024 5:35 PM > To: Paul Wouters <p...@nohats.ca> > Cc: ipsec@ietf.org > Subject: [IPsec] Re: Are there any issues of reusing IPsec key for generating > Authentication Code? > > Paul, > > Thank you very much for the comment. > Is it acceptable to use the existing IPsec keys as input to a key derivation > function (KDF)? The KDF generates unique authentication keys that are > cryptographically linked to the IPsec keys but not directly exposed. > > Linda > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Paul Wouters <p...@nohats.ca> > Sent: Wednesday, July 10, 2024 8:59 AM > To: Linda Dunbar <linda.dun...@futurewei.com> > Cc: ipsec@ietf.org > Subject: Re: [IPsec] Are there any issues of reusing IPsec key for generating > Authentication Code? > > On Tue, 9 Jul 2024, Linda Dunbar wrote: > > > 1. The IPsec tunnel itself provides a secure channel for transmitting the > authentication keys. This ensures that the keys > > are protected from eavesdropping or tampering during distribution. > > 2. Reuse the existing IPsec keys as input to a key derivation function > > (KDF). > The KDF generates unique authentication keys > > that are cryptographically linked to the IPsec keys but not directly > exposed. This adds a layer of protection, even if > > the IPsec keys are compromised. > > Re-using keys for different purposes is not recommend on principle. Some > certifications (eg FIPS) also forbid dual use of the same key(pair). > > Paul > > _______________________________________________ > IPsec mailing list -- ipsec@ietf.org > To unsubscribe send an email to ipsec-le...@ietf.org _______________________________________________ IPsec mailing list -- ipsec@ietf.org To unsubscribe send an email to ipsec-le...@ietf.org