On Jun 29, 2021, at 14:17, Daniel Migault <mglt.i...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > I thought the purpose of the draft was to be able to say "look at this > document it says you MUST switch to IKEv2 if you want to remain IPsec > interoperable. I am suprised I do not see the MUST in question. I am fine > whatever chair/co-authors are fine with.
I agree with Yoav, the RFC 2119 language is for code implementations, not humans. People outside the IETF may see the whole document as a MUST for compliance, which is good for us :) Paul _______________________________________________ IPsec mailing list IPsec@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec
