> On Jan 17, 2021, at 4:34 PM, Tero Kivinen <kivi...@iki.fi> wrote: > > Christian Hopps writes: >> Also, as per the last IETF meeting, can we please start an WG >> adoption call on the supporting YANG draft? >> >> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-fedyk-ipsecme-yang-iptfs/ > > I think this draft is not exactly in sync with the main iptfs, as it
[...] Don replied to many of your points, a couple comments below from me: > and it has this use-path-mtu, which does not tell which > algorithm is used etc. Correct, this draft was published prior to the addition of PLMTUD to the base specification (from the tsvart review). We'll update this in the next revision. > Is there going to be update for this draft to get it in sync with the > main draft? Yes, of course, we're just requesting WG adoption, presumably there will be reviews (like yours) and revisions to address them. :) Thanks, Chris. > -- > kivi...@iki.fi > > _______________________________________________ > IPsec mailing list > IPsec@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec >
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP
_______________________________________________ IPsec mailing list IPsec@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec
