Christian Hopps writes: > Also, as per the last IETF meeting, can we please start an WG > adoption call on the supporting YANG draft? > > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-fedyk-ipsecme-yang-iptfs/
I think this draft is not exactly in sync with the main iptfs, as it still has some counters etc that would indicate there could be non aggregated and aggregated packets mixed in same SA, and it says that IP-TFS may be run only in one direction, but when using IKE I think the IP-TFS is always for in both directions, but of course the paramters and data rates might be different in different directions. Also there is ietf-i2nsf-ikel...@20202-10-30.yang which looks like typo, and it has this use-path-mtu, which does not tell which algorithm is used etc. Also I do not know what tx-drop-packets is supposed to mean? If we have already sent them how can we find out information whether it was dropped or not. Or is that supposed to be tx-queue-drop-packets, i.e., packets that were dropped before added to the outer ESP packet? Also it is difficult to say whether some of the counters are counting inner or outer packets, so it would be better to be more exact with the wordings, i.e., in addition of using -inner- perhaps also use -outer-. Is there going to be update for this draft to get it in sync with the main draft? -- kivi...@iki.fi _______________________________________________ IPsec mailing list IPsec@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec
