I really think it makes most sense to push put in the early allocation
request. This is a valid long term use case. There's no real shortage
of IP numbers and IANA is continuing to assign them. Also there's also
a slew of them that can be reclaimed if/when they do become scarce. I
can even vouch for giving up one (v5) if/when needed - it's already
marked historic;-)
Lou
On 6/25/2020 12:41 PM, Michael Richardson wrote:
Michael Richardson <mcr+i...@sandelman.ca> wrote:
> But, we are not out of protocol numbers, and I think that if it comes to
recycling
> numbers, that maybe there are many low-hanging fruit as candidates.
> [13-16,18-26 comes easily to mind]
If I had to pick something, though, I'd pick 57, SKIP :-)
--
Michael Richardson <mcr+i...@sandelman.ca>, Sandelman Software Works
-= IPv6 IoT consulting =-
_______________________________________________
IPsec mailing list
IPsec@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec
_______________________________________________
IPsec mailing list
IPsec@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec
