Michael Richardson <mcr+i...@sandelman.ca> wrote:
> But, we are not out of protocol numbers, and I think that if it comes to
recycling
> numbers, that maybe there are many low-hanging fruit as candidates.
> [13-16,18-26 comes easily to mind]If I had to pick something, though, I'd pick 57, SKIP :-) -- Michael Richardson <mcr+i...@sandelman.ca>, Sandelman Software Works -= IPv6 IoT consulting =-
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ IPsec mailing list IPsec@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec
