NIST standards are mandatory for a subset of US citizens. But enough of 
businesses outside the US pay attention to what NIST says to make adding the 
reference relevant and useful.

> On Dec 25, 2019, at 01:52, Valery Smyslov <s...@elvis.ru> wrote:
> 
> 
> Hi Watson,
>  
> thank you for spending your time on this review in Christmas Eve.
>  
> The capitalization issue has been already noticed and fixed.
>  
> I’m not sure the draft should mention NIST levels, because
> they are relevant mostly for US customers. I think that
> generic recommendations on key sizes are more appropriate
> for this document.
>  
> Regards,
> Valery.
>  
> Damn misclick. I meant With Nits.
>  
> On Tue, Dec 24, 2019 at 8:02 PM Watson Ladd via Datatracker 
> <nore...@ietf.org> wrote:
> Reviewer: Watson Ladd
> Review result: Not Ready
> 
> Twas the night before Christmas
> when all through the house
> someone was desperately trying to get a review done on time.
> 
> I didn't see anything wrong per se in the draft itself, but I found the
> capitalization of quantum computer an odd choice. IKEv2 is a complicated
> protocol, and I am not 100% sure that this draft does what we want it to: It
> would be great if someone could check very carefully in some symbolic model,
> ala what has been done in TLS. The guidance on sizes seems to rule out NIST
> level 1, but not any higher levels: might be worth calling out this 
> explicitly.
> 
> _______________________________________________
> secdir mailing list
> sec...@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/secdir
> wiki: http://tools.ietf.org/area/sec/trac/wiki/SecDirReview
> 
> 
> --
> "Man is born free, but everywhere he is in chains".
> --Rousseau.
> _______________________________________________
> secdir mailing list
> sec...@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/secdir
> wiki: http://tools.ietf.org/area/sec/trac/wiki/SecDirReview

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

_______________________________________________
IPsec mailing list
IPsec@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec

Reply via email to