Damn misclick. I meant With Nits. On Tue, Dec 24, 2019 at 8:02 PM Watson Ladd via Datatracker < nore...@ietf.org> wrote:
> Reviewer: Watson Ladd > Review result: Not Ready > > Twas the night before Christmas > when all through the house > someone was desperately trying to get a review done on time. > > I didn't see anything wrong per se in the draft itself, but I found the > capitalization of quantum computer an odd choice. IKEv2 is a complicated > protocol, and I am not 100% sure that this draft does what we want it to: > It > would be great if someone could check very carefully in some symbolic > model, > ala what has been done in TLS. The guidance on sizes seems to rule out NIST > level 1, but not any higher levels: might be worth calling out this > explicitly. > > _______________________________________________ > secdir mailing list > sec...@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/secdir > wiki: http://tools.ietf.org/area/sec/trac/wiki/SecDirReview > -- "Man is born free, but everywhere he is in chains". --Rousseau.
_______________________________________________ IPsec mailing list IPsec@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec
