Christian Hopps <cho...@chopps.org> wrote:
> Additionally, I'm not sure that we should be so quick to say that the
> IP-TFS payload would never be used outside of ESP; as was pointed out
> by Michael using this payload does solve the PMTU issue with (IPsec)
> tunnels, it could be re-used for this purpose outside of ESP as well.I think that I was mis-interpreted. I wasn't saying that this protocol would get used outside of ESP. I'm saying that this protocol (with ESP) will solve the PMTU problem, and so make IPsec more popular. Maybe that also means that being able to use it with transport mode could be interesting, but I think that BEET mode is more likely. I think that having a proper IP protocol number will simplify kernel implementations. -- ] Never tell me the odds! | ipv6 mesh networks [ ] Michael Richardson, Sandelman Software Works | IoT architect [ ] m...@sandelman.ca http://www.sandelman.ca/ | ruby on rails [
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ IPsec mailing list IPsec@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec
