Sec. 3 of the draft lists each of the issues described in the Problem
Statement, and explains how it is resolved.
Thanks,
Yaron
On 07/19/2010 08:02 PM, Paul Hoffman wrote:
First off: thank you to the design team for the work you put into this. The
rest of the WG didn't see this, but the group worked hard and met often.
One of the things that interests me as chair is: does this proposed protocol meet the
requirement set out in our
RFC-to-be<http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-ipsecme-ipsec-ha-09.txt>?
If not, what is missing, and can it be added easily to the proposed protocol?
This will definitely be one of the points of discussion a week from now in
Maastricht, but folks can start discussing it here on the list now in
preparation for the meeting.
--Paul Hoffman, Director
--VPN Consortium
_______________________________________________
IPsec mailing list
IPsec@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec
_______________________________________________
IPsec mailing list
IPsec@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec
