Hi everyone,

Please note that most of the discussion in Maastricht will be around this draft, so you are strongly encouraged to read it.

For those who cannot make it to Holland, please use the IETF audio streaming to listen in, and Jabber to participate in real time. More details here: http://www.ietf.org/meeting/78/remote-participation.html. We will *not* have WebEX for IPsecME this time.

Thanks,
        Yaron


On 07/19/2010 01:24 PM, Raj Singh wrote:
Hi Group,

We have come up with new version of the "IPsec Cluster Solution"draft
addressing comments which we got, the new version can be find here:
http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/ipsecme/trac/wiki/TempDocs.
<http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/ipsecme/trac/wiki/TempDocs>
We will submit the draft as soon as submission window re-opens.
Please read the draft and give you comments before Maastricht meeting.

Regards,
Raj


On Sun, Jul 11, 2010 at 4:39 PM, Raj Singh <rsjen...@gmail.com
<mailto:rsjen...@gmail.com>> wrote:

    Hi Group,

    We would like to present the HA design team's output for IPsec
    Cluster Solution Draft before Maastricht meeting as
    http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-kagarigi-ipsecme-ikev2-windowsync-03.txt

    This draft solves the main issues of IPsec Cluster Problem Statement
    draft using a simple IKEv2 protocol extension, and  provides
    implementation advice for other issues.

    I sincerely thanks all the team members of HA Design Team for
    attending all internal meetings and giving their valuable inputs and
    doing reviews.
    My special thanks to Yaron and Yoav for their expert inputs and
    comments. I would also like to thanks Paul for providing TeamSpeak
    server for conducting internal design team meetings.

    The team started with these draft as inputs.
    1.
    http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-kagarigi-ipsecme-ikev2-windowsync-00 -
    G. Kalyani
    2.
    http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-arora-ipsecme-ikev2-alt-tunnel-addresses-00.txt
    J. Arora
    3. http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-ipsecme-ipsec-ha-09.txt - Y.
    Nir - As Input

    The current draft is based on [1], then it got enhanced and extended
    with all team's contribution.
    The problem and solution presented in [2], is more towards load
    balancing than HA cluster.
    Also this problem can be solved using IKEv2 REDIRECT mechanism.
    Also, this solution requires IKEv2
    protocol change. So, this is deferred for now.

    I request the IPsecME group members to review and give comments on
    http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-kagarigi-ipsecme-ikev2-windowsync-03.txt,
    so that we can discuss this draft with more details in Maastricht
    meeting.

    Regards,
    Raj Singh
    On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 11:56 AM, Yaron Sheffer
    <yaronf.i...@gmail.com <mailto:yaronf.i...@gmail.com>> wrote:

        Hi,

        As promised, we have started a design team on IPsec HA. Paul and
        I have asked Raj Singh to lead the team. His job is to make sure
        that the team meets regularly in the next few weeks, and
        produces a good output document before the Maastricht
        face-to-face meeting.

        The initial membership of the team is:

        - Raj Singh (rsjen...@gmail.com <mailto:rsjen...@gmail.com>, lead)

        - Jitender Arora (jar...@acmepacket.com
        <mailto:jar...@acmepacket.com>)
        - Min Huang (huang...@huaweisymantec.com
        <mailto:huang...@huaweisymantec.com>)
        - Dacheng Zhang (zhangdach...@huawei.com
        <mailto:zhangdach...@huawei.com>)
        - Yoav Nir (y...@checkpoint.com <mailto:y...@checkpoint.com>)
        - Yaron Sheffer (yaronf.i...@gmail.com
        <mailto:yaronf.i...@gmail.com>, observer)

        According to IETF rules (see
        http://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/design-team.htm), every
        design team needs to have a mission statement. So here it is:

        Produce a high-level solution document that covers most or all
        of the issues raised by the HA problem statement
        (draft-ietf-ipsecme-ipsec-ha). Any solution should be applicable
        to different deployments, in order to accommodate the variety of
        existing and future IPsec products. Solutions should have a
        similar level of security as the IKE/IPsec suite.

        Another process reminder: the design team's output serves as
        input to the full WG, essentially like an individual draft. So
        all protocol decisions will eventually be made by the working group.

        Thanks,
                Yaron

        _______________________________________________
        IPsec mailing list
        IPsec@ietf.org <mailto:IPsec@ietf.org>
        https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec





_______________________________________________
IPsec mailing list
IPsec@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec
_______________________________________________
IPsec mailing list
IPsec@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec

Reply via email to