I would like to coauthor IKE/IPsec high availability and load sharing. Looks like a challenging and intereting problem. Thanks -ns murthy
________________________________ From: ipsec-boun...@ietf.org [mailto:ipsec-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Daniel Migault Sent: Monday, December 07, 2009 9:02 PM To: Michael Richardson Cc: ipsec@ietf.org Subject: Re: [IPsec] Proposed work item: IKE/IPsec high availability andload sharing I will also review this document. Regards, Daniel On Fri, Dec 4, 2009 at 4:17 AM, Michael Richardson <m...@sandelman.ca> wrote: Yaron Sheffer wrote: This work item will define the problem statement and requirements for a solution that allows interoperable HA/LS device groups. Mixed-vendor clusters are specifically out of scope; but single-vendor clusters should be fully interoperable with other vendors' devices or clusters. The main challenge is to overcome the strict use of sequence numbers in both IPsec and IKE, in HA and LS scenarios. Following the Hiroshima discussion, the WI is initially focused on defining the problem, rather than a particular solution. Proposed starting point: http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-nir-ipsecme-ipsecha-00.txt. Please reply to the list: It is interesting work, and may well be valuable. It is not a priority to me, and I would not have time to work on it. I might read a WG FC, and I might respond to threads, if I came across them. _______________________________________________ IPsec mailing list IPsec@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec -- Daniel Migault Orange Labs -- Security +33 6 70 72 69 58
_______________________________________________ IPsec mailing list IPsec@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec
