Paul Hoffman writes: > MUST either offer no integrity algorithm or a single integrity > algorithm of "none", with no integrity algorithm being the preferred > method
That is fine for me. It would also be fine for me to change "preferred" with "RECOMMENDED" (RFC2119 synonym for SHOULD), but I can accept on not using RFC2119 language too. -- [email protected] _______________________________________________ IPsec mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec
