At 11:34 AM -0500 11/25/09, Scott C Moonen wrote: > > MUST either offer no integrity algorithm or a single integrity algorithm of > > "none" >> >> Does anyone have a problem with this new wording? > >I suggest we specify that one or the other as the preferred approach. Maybe >add an additional sentence saying SHOULD for no transform and MAY for >transform=none?
I hate honing down that far: it confuses future developers. How about: MUST either offer no integrity algorithm or a single integrity algorithm of "none", with no integrity algorithm being the preferred method --Paul Hoffman, Director --VPN Consortium _______________________________________________ IPsec mailing list IPsec@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec
