> > Whoops, I was wrong. I looked at 4552 and they do cite ESP-NULL (although > they never refer to it that way) as a MUST, and AH as a MAY.
Ok, so can we work on deprecating AH? This way new standards defined in other WGs dont have to provide support for AH. Jack > > I probably was confused because the authors did not understand the IPsec > model as per RFC 4301, when I sat down and talked with them over 3 years > ago, with Sam Hartman in his SEC AD role. I am amazed that, in the final > analysis, they did try to adhere to the 4301 model (see section 11)! > > I don't know if any other apps have done what I thought (erroneously) had > been done here. > > Steve > > _______________________________________________ IPsec mailing list IPsec@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec