Hi all Recently there's been some discussions about creating an IKE SA without child SAs (on purpose).
I'm still not entirely convinced that this is necessary, but I have submitted this draft, and would like to hear comments about it. Does it fill the need that some people on this mailing list expressed? Thanks Yoav > -----Original Message----- > From: i-d-announce-boun...@ietf.org > [mailto:i-d-announce-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of > internet-dra...@ietf.org > Sent: Thursday, May 21, 2009 3:45 PM > To: i-d-annou...@ietf.org > Subject: I-D Action:draft-nir-ike-nochild-00.txt > > A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line > Internet-Drafts directories. > > Title : A Childless Initiation of the IKE SA > Author(s) : Y. Nir > Filename : draft-nir-ike-nochild-00.txt > Pages : 6 > Date : 2009-05-21 > > This document describes an extension to the IKEv2 protocol > that allows an IKE SA to be created and authenticated without > generating a child SA. > > A URL for this Internet-Draft is: > http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-nir-ike-nochild-00.txt > > Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at: > ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/ Email secured by Check Point _______________________________________________ IPsec mailing list IPsec@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec
