Hi all Recently there's been some discussions about creating an IKE SA without child SAs (on purpose).
I'm still not entirely convinced that this is necessary, but I have submitted this draft, and would like to hear comments about it. Does it fill the need that some people on this mailing list expressed? Thanks Yoav -----Original Message----- From: i-d-announce-boun...@ietf.org [mailto:i-d-announce-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of internet-dra...@ietf.org Sent: Thursday, May 21, 2009 3:45 PM To: i-d-annou...@ietf.org Subject: I-D Action:draft-nir-ike-nochild-00.txt A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories. Title : A Childless Initiation of the IKE SA Author(s) : Y. Nir Filename : draft-nir-ike-nochild-00.txt Pages : 6 Date : 2009-05-21 This document describes an extension to the IKEv2 protocol that allows an IKE SA to be created and authenticated without generating a child SA. A URL for this Internet-Draft is: http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-nir-ike-nochild-00.txt Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at: ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/ Email secured by Check Point
<<< message/external-body; name="draft-nir-ike-nochild-00.url": Unrecognized >>>
_______________________________________________ IPsec mailing list IPsec@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec
