Steve _______________________________________________ IPsec mailing list IPsec@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec
If we elect to keep the next header field, to help middle boxes
quickly locate header fields of interest to them, then we MUST
require the recipient of each message to do a (well-defined)
consistency check on the packet, for the reasons I cited in SF.
- Re: [IPsec] Issue #93: Next header value in... Grewal, Ken
- Re: [IPsec] Issue #93: Next header valu... Yaron Sheffer
- Re: [IPsec] Issue #93: Next header value in... Michael Richardson
- [IPsec] Next Header field in WESP heade... Bhatia, Manav (Manav)
- Re: [IPsec] Next Header field in WE... gabriel montenegro
- Re: [IPsec] Next Header field ... Yaron Sheffer
- Re: [IPsec] Next Header field ... Tero Kivinen
- Re: [IPsec] Next Header fi... Bhatia, Manav (Manav)
- Re: [IPsec] Next Header fi... Tero Kivinen
- Re: [IPsec] Next Header fi... Bhatia, Manav (Manav)
- Re: [IPsec] Next Header fi... Stephen Kent
- Re: [IPsec] Next Header fi... gabriel montenegro
- Re: [IPsec] Next Header fi... Tero Kivinen
- Re: [IPsec] Next Header fi... Yaron Sheffer
- Re: [IPsec] Next Header fi... Tero Kivinen
- Re: [IPsec] Next Header fi... Grewal, Ken
- Re: [IPsec] Comments to draft-ietf-ipsecme-ikev2-red... Vijay Devarapalli
- [IPsec] ipsec-requ...@ietf.org?subject=unsubscr... Satinder Singh
- Re: [IPsec] Comments to draft-ietf-ipsecme-ikev... Tero Kivinen
- Re: [IPsec] Comments to draft-ietf-ipsecme-... Vijay Devarapalli