Christian (and others who may have suggestions), On the ATG call today a question came up about how to flag JIRA tickets as “needing developer resource”. The example in this case is the Core Privacy CR which has a JIRA ticket but no implementation owner. We felt it would be a useful thing if we could run a query at the TSC level that would bring up all features needing implementation owners.
My first though was a simple tag “NEEDS_DEVELOPER_RESOURCE” or similar, but first, do you know if there’s an existing JIRA BKM for this kind of thing? Tags are great, but they have a way of not being used consistently, especially at a high level that spans multiple components. Thanks, Nathan From: Christian Gran [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Tuesday, April 3, 2018 3:06 AM To: [email protected] Cc: Heldt-Sheller, Nathan <[email protected]>; 최우제 <[email protected]>; [email protected]; Maloor, Kishen <[email protected]> Subject: Re: [dev] New filed request for distinguish IoTivity and IoTivity-Lite(IoTivity-constrai Hi, there is now a component for build system thanks Christian On 3. Apr 2018, at 04:05, 조제현 <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: Hi, How about add for build(or ci?) components? I actually would like to raise a issue for jenkins build. Please consider about that too. Thanks. jaehyun. --------- Original Message --------- Sender : Heldt-Sheller, Nathan <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> Date : 2018-04-03 03:05 (GMT+9) Title : Re: [dev] New filed request for distinguish IoTivity and IoTivity-Lite(IoTivity-constrai Thanks Christian, worked this time! From: Christian Gran [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Monday, April 2, 2018 10:49 AM To: Heldt-Sheller, Nathan <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>; [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>; [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>; Maloor, Kishen <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> Subject: Re: [dev] New filed request for distinguish IoTivity and IoTivity-Lite(IoTivity-constrai Hi, added for now security, coap and base stack, so that we can start creating tickets. Please tell me which other components may be needed thanks Christian On 2. Apr 2018, at 19:23, Heldt-Sheller, Nathan <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: Hi Christian, I just tried to add an issue to LITE and couldn’t because “components” haven’t been defined and yet are a required field. Can you add a placeholder “security” component (which can certainly be renamed/removed later if Kishen decides it’s not right)? Thanks, Nathan From: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of ??? (Uze Choi) Sent: Sunday, April 1, 2018 5:55 PM To: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> Subject: Re: [dev] New filed request for distinguish IoTivity and IoTivity-Lite(IoTivity-constrai For the issue regarding iotivity-constrained repo, Please use the https://jira.iotivity.org/projects/LITE . I copied IoTivity-Constrained stack Jira ticket on iotivity jira into iotivity LITE jira. Thanks Christian/C.J BR, Uze Choi From: C.J. Collier [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Friday, March 30, 2018 2:21 AM To: 최우제(Uze Choi) Cc: Christian Gran; [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> Subject: Re: [dev] New filed request for distinguish IoTivity and IoTivity-Lite(IoTivity-constrai https://jira.iotivity.org/projects/LITE On Wed, Mar 28, 2018 at 1:49 AM, 최우제 <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: Hi Christian, Different jira will do. Please share the uri to access. BR Uze Choi --------- Original Message --------- Sender : Christian Gran <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> Date : 2018-03-28 17:19 (GMT+9) Title : Re: New filed request for distinguish IoTivity and IoTivity-Lite(IoTivity-constrained) Hi, the original idea was to have a 2nd Jira project (it is already there) for constrained. We should not mix the projects - constrained has totally different modules. Shall I rename the iotivity-constrained project to motivity-light ? thanks Christian On 28. Mar 2018, at 05:30, 최우제 (Uze Choi) <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: Hi Christian Could you add the filed to select the system between IoTivity and IoTivity-Lite(Official name from OCF) in jira. I believe it will be better to follow OCF naming which is IoTivity-Lite instead of IoTivity-constrained. Margaret, Could you give your opinion for naming? BR, Uze Choi <image001.gif> _______________________________________________ iotivity-dev mailing list [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> https://lists.iotivity.org/mailman/listinfo/iotivity-dev _______________________________________________ iotivity-dev mailing list [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> https://lists.iotivity.org/mailman/listinfo/iotivity-dev _______________________________________________ iotivity-dev mailing list [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> https://lists.iotivity.org/mailman/listinfo/iotivity-dev <Mail Attachment.gif>
_______________________________________________ iotivity-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.iotivity.org/mailman/listinfo/iotivity-dev
