Thanks Christian, worked this time!

From: Christian Gran [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Monday, April 2, 2018 10:49 AM
To: Heldt-Sheller, Nathan <[email protected]>; [email protected]; 
[email protected]; Maloor, Kishen <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [dev] New filed request for distinguish IoTivity and 
IoTivity-Lite(IoTivity-constrai

Hi,

added for now security, coap and base stack, so that we can start creating 
tickets.
Please tell me which other components may be needed

thanks
  Christian



On 2. Apr 2018, at 19:23, Heldt-Sheller, Nathan 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

Hi Christian,

I just tried to add an issue to LITE and couldn’t because “components” haven’t 
been defined and yet are a required field.

Can you add a placeholder “security” component (which can certainly be 
renamed/removed later if Kishen decides it’s not right)?

Thanks,
Nathan

From: 
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
 [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of ??? (Uze Choi)
Sent: Sunday, April 1, 2018 5:55 PM
To: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [dev] New filed request for distinguish IoTivity and 
IoTivity-Lite(IoTivity-constrai

For the issue regarding iotivity-constrained repo, Please use the 
https://jira.iotivity.org/projects/LITE .
I copied IoTivity-Constrained stack Jira ticket on iotivity jira into iotivity 
LITE jira.

Thanks Christian/C.J
BR, Uze Choi
From: C.J. Collier [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Friday, March 30, 2018 2:21 AM
To: 최우제(Uze Choi)
Cc: Christian Gran; 
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [dev] New filed request for distinguish IoTivity and 
IoTivity-Lite(IoTivity-constrai

https://jira.iotivity.org/projects/LITE

On Wed, Mar 28, 2018 at 1:49 AM, 최우제 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
Hi Christian,
Different jira will do.
Please share the uri to access.
BR Uze Choi

--------- Original Message ---------
Sender : Christian Gran 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Date : 2018-03-28 17:19 (GMT+9)
Title : Re: New filed request for distinguish IoTivity and 
IoTivity-Lite(IoTivity-constrained)
Hi,

the original idea was to have a 2nd Jira project (it is already there) for 
constrained.
We should not mix the projects - constrained has totally different modules.
Shall I rename the iotivity-constrained project to motivity-light ?

thanks
  Christian


On 28. Mar 2018, at 05:30, 최우제 (Uze Choi) 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

Hi Christian
Could you add the filed to select the system between IoTivity and 
IoTivity-Lite(Official name from OCF) in jira.
I believe it will be better to follow OCF naming which is IoTivity-Lite instead 
of IoTivity-constrained.

Margaret,
Could you give your opinion for naming?

BR, Uze Choi




<image001.gif>

[http://ext.samsung.net/mail/ext/v1/external/status/update?userid=uzchoi&do=bWFpbElEPTIwMTgwMzI4MDg0OTM2ZXBjbXMxcDc0ZjY4ZjEzNzU0NDVjOWJmZTgwOWViNjdlNDEwZjQ0NiZyZWNpcGllbnRBZGRyZXNzPWlvdGl2aXR5LWRldkBsaXN0cy5pb3Rpdml0eS5vcmc_]
_______________________________________________
iotivity-dev mailing list
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
https://lists.iotivity.org/mailman/listinfo/iotivity-dev

_______________________________________________
iotivity-dev mailing list
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
https://lists.iotivity.org/mailman/listinfo/iotivity-dev

_______________________________________________
iotivity-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.iotivity.org/mailman/listinfo/iotivity-dev

Reply via email to