On 10/01/13 07:24, uZu wrote:
Hi there, I also think that moving to git is a good step but Mercurial would have been as good, both are decentralized and powerful SCM, which is what really matters ^^
FWIW I would have been happy with either. I have more experience with hg and I think it has a cleaner UI. OTOH git does some more advanced things that hg doesn't (although it can with plugins). For whatever reason hg seems to have a stronger foothold in the commercial software arena, but in the open source world git is quickly becoming the de facto option.
They're more or less equivalent and I didn't really have strong feelings for one or the other. I *did* think however that we really ought to start using some DVCS system. So git it is.
_______________________________________________ ioquake3 mailing list ioquake3@lists.ioquake.org http://lists.ioquake.org/listinfo.cgi/ioquake3-ioquake.org By sending this message I agree to love ioquake3 and libsdl.
