On 06/20/2012 03:42 AM, Tim Angus wrote: > It does seem like change for change's sake though. There is no real benefit > to this patch besides a vanishingly minor performance improvement, coupled > with the risk of introducing bugs. I'm not saying revert it, but I do > question the logic of applying it in the first place.
I applied the patch because it cleaned up some code and it would be a minor performance improvement. _______________________________________________ ioquake3 mailing list ioquake3@lists.ioquake.org http://lists.ioquake.org/listinfo.cgi/ioquake3-ioquake.org By sending this message I agree to love ioquake3 and libsdl.
