Hi Chuck,

On 1/26/21 11:52 PM, Chuck Lever wrote:


On Jan 26, 2021, at 1:18 AM, Lu Baolu <baolu...@linux.intel.com> wrote:

On 2021/1/26 3:31, Chuck Lever wrote:
On Jan 25, 2021, at 12:39 PM, Chuck Lever <chuck.le...@oracle.com> wrote:

Hello Lu -

Many thanks for your prototype.


On Jan 24, 2021, at 9:38 PM, Lu Baolu <baolu...@linux.intel.com> wrote:

This patch series is only for Request-For-Testing purpose. It aims to
fix the performance regression reported here.

https://lore.kernel.org/linux-iommu/d81314ed-5673-44a6-b597-090e3cb83...@oracle.com/

The first two patches are borrowed from here.

https://lore.kernel.org/linux-iommu/20210107122909.16317-1-yong...@mediatek.com/

Please kindly help to verification.

Best regards,
baolu

Lu Baolu (1):
iommu/vt-d: Add iotlb_sync_map callback

Yong Wu (2):
iommu: Move iotlb_sync_map out from __iommu_map
iommu: Add iova and size as parameters in iotlb_sync_map

drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.c | 86 +++++++++++++++++++++++++------------
drivers/iommu/iommu.c       | 23 +++++++---
drivers/iommu/tegra-gart.c  |  7 ++-
include/linux/iommu.h       |  3 +-
4 files changed, 83 insertions(+), 36 deletions(-)

Here are results with the NFS client at stock v5.11-rc5 and the
NFS server at v5.10, showing the regression I reported earlier.

        Children see throughput for 12 initial writers  = 4534582.00 kB/sec
        Parent sees throughput for 12 initial writers   = 4458145.56 kB/sec
        Min throughput per process                      = 373101.59 kB/sec
        Max throughput per process                      = 382669.50 kB/sec
        Avg throughput per process                      = 377881.83 kB/sec
        Min xfer                                        = 1022720.00 kB
        CPU Utilization: Wall time    2.787    CPU time    1.922    CPU 
utilization  68.95 %


        Children see throughput for 12 rewriters        = 4542003.12 kB/sec
        Parent sees throughput for 12 rewriters         = 4538024.19 kB/sec
        Min throughput per process                      = 374672.00 kB/sec
        Max throughput per process                      = 383983.78 kB/sec
        Avg throughput per process                      = 378500.26 kB/sec
        Min xfer                                        = 1022976.00 kB
        CPU utilization: Wall time    2.733    CPU time    1.947    CPU 
utilization  71.25 %


        Children see throughput for 12 readers          = 4568632.03 kB/sec
        Parent sees throughput for 12 readers           = 4563672.02 kB/sec
        Min throughput per process                      = 376727.56 kB/sec
        Max throughput per process                      = 383783.91 kB/sec
        Avg throughput per process                      = 380719.34 kB/sec
        Min xfer                                        = 1029376.00 kB
        CPU utilization: Wall time    2.733    CPU time    1.898    CPU 
utilization  69.46 %


        Children see throughput for 12 re-readers       = 4610702.78 kB/sec
        Parent sees throughput for 12 re-readers        = 4606135.66 kB/sec
        Min throughput per process                      = 381532.78 kB/sec
        Max throughput per process                      = 387072.53 kB/sec
        Avg throughput per process                      = 384225.23 kB/sec
        Min xfer                                        = 1034496.00 kB
        CPU utilization: Wall time    2.711    CPU time    1.910    CPU 
utilization  70.45 %

Here's the NFS client at v5.11-rc5 with your series applied.
The NFS server remains at v5.10:

        Children see throughput for 12 initial writers  = 4434778.81 kB/sec
        Parent sees throughput for 12 initial writers   = 4408190.69 kB/sec
        Min throughput per process                      = 367865.28 kB/sec
        Max throughput per process                      = 371134.38 kB/sec
        Avg throughput per process                      = 369564.90 kB/sec
        Min xfer                                        = 1039360.00 kB
        CPU Utilization: Wall time    2.842    CPU time    1.904    CPU 
utilization  66.99 %


        Children see throughput for 12 rewriters        = 4476870.69 kB/sec
        Parent sees throughput for 12 rewriters         = 4471701.48 kB/sec
        Min throughput per process                      = 370985.34 kB/sec
        Max throughput per process                      = 374752.28 kB/sec
        Avg throughput per process                      = 373072.56 kB/sec
        Min xfer                                        = 1038592.00 kB
        CPU utilization: Wall time    2.801    CPU time    1.902    CPU 
utilization  67.91 %


        Children see throughput for 12 readers          = 5865268.88 kB/sec
        Parent sees throughput for 12 readers           = 5854519.73 kB/sec
        Min throughput per process                      = 487766.81 kB/sec
        Max throughput per process                      = 489623.88 kB/sec
        Avg throughput per process                      = 488772.41 kB/sec
        Min xfer                                        = 1044736.00 kB
        CPU utilization: Wall time    2.144    CPU time    1.895    CPU 
utilization  88.41 %


        Children see throughput for 12 re-readers       = 5847438.62 kB/sec
        Parent sees throughput for 12 re-readers        = 5839292.18 kB/sec
        Min throughput per process                      = 485835.03 kB/sec
        Max throughput per process                      = 488702.12 kB/sec
        Avg throughput per process                      = 487286.55 kB/sec
        Min xfer                                        = 1042688.00 kB
        CPU utilization: Wall time    2.148    CPU time    1.909    CPU 
utilization  88.84 %

NFS READ throughput is almost fully restored. A normal-looking throughput
result, copied from the previous thread, is:

        Children see throughput for 12 readers          = 5921370.94 kB/sec
        Parent sees throughput for 12 readers           = 5914106.69 kB/sec

The NFS WRITE throughput result appears to be unchanged, or slightly
worse than before. I don't have an explanation for this result. I applied
your patches on the NFS server also without noting improvement.
Function-boundary tracing shows some interesting results.
# trace-cmd record -e rpcrdma -e iommu -p function_graph --max-graph-depth=5 -g 
dma_map_sg_attrs
Some 120KB SGLs are DMA-mapped in a single call to __iommu_map(). Other SGLs of
the same size need as many as one __iommu_map() call per SGL element (which
would be 30 for a 120KB SGL).
In v5.10, intel_map_sg() was structured such that an SGL is always handled with
a single call to domain_mapping() and thus always just a single TLB flush.
My amateur theorizing suggests that the SGL element coalescing done in
__iommu_map_sg() is not working as well as intel_map_sg() used to, which results
in more calls to domain_mapping(). Not only does that take longer, but it 
creates
many more DMA maps. Could that also have some impact on device TLB resources?

It seems that more domain_mapping() calls are not caused by
__iommu_map_sg() but __iommu_map().

Can you please test below changes? It call intel_iommu_map() directly
instead of __iommu_map().

diff --git a/drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.c b/drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.c
index f5a236e63ded..660d5744a117 100644
--- a/drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.c
+++ b/drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.c
@@ -4916,7 +4916,7 @@ intel_iommu_sva_invalidate(struct iommu_domain *domain, 
struct device *dev,
}
#endif

-static int intel_iommu_map(struct iommu_domain *domain,
+int intel_iommu_map(struct iommu_domain *domain,
                           unsigned long iova, phys_addr_t hpa,
                           size_t size, int iommu_prot, gfp_t gfp)
{
diff --git a/drivers/iommu/iommu.c b/drivers/iommu/iommu.c
index 3d099a31ddca..a1b41fd3fb4e 100644
--- a/drivers/iommu/iommu.c
+++ b/drivers/iommu/iommu.c
@@ -23,8 +23,13 @@
#include <linux/property.h>
#include <linux/fsl/mc.h>
#include <linux/module.h>
+#include <linux/intel-iommu.h>
#include <trace/events/iommu.h>

+extern int intel_iommu_map(struct iommu_domain *domain,
+                          unsigned long iova, phys_addr_t hpa,
+                          size_t size, int iommu_prot, gfp_t gfp);
+
static struct kset *iommu_group_kset;
static DEFINE_IDA(iommu_group_ida);

@@ -2553,8 +2558,7 @@ static size_t __iommu_map_sg(struct iommu_domain *domain, 
unsigned long iova,
                phys_addr_t s_phys = sg_phys(sg);

                if (len && s_phys != start + len) {
-                       ret = __iommu_map(domain, iova + mapped, start,
-                                       len, prot, gfp);
+                       ret = intel_iommu_map(domain, iova + mapped, start, 
len, prot, gfp);

                        if (ret)
                                goto out_err;

Does it change anything?

I removed yesterday's 3-patch series, and applied the above.
Not a full restoration, but interesting nonetheless.

Do you mind having a try with all 4 patches?


        Children see throughput for 12 initial writers  = 4852657.22 kB/sec
        Parent sees throughput for 12 initial writers   = 4826730.38 kB/sec
        Min throughput per process                      =  403196.09 kB/sec
        Max throughput per process                      =  406071.47 kB/sec
        Avg throughput per process                      =  404388.10 kB/sec
        Min xfer                                        = 1041408.00 kB
        CPU Utilization: Wall time    2.596    CPU time    2.047    CPU 
utilization  78.84 %


        Children see throughput for 12 rewriters        = 4853900.22 kB/sec
        Parent sees throughput for 12 rewriters         = 4848623.31 kB/sec
        Min throughput per process                      =  403380.81 kB/sec
        Max throughput per process                      =  405478.53 kB/sec
        Avg throughput per process                      =  404491.68 kB/sec
        Min xfer                                        = 1042944.00 kB
        CPU utilization: Wall time    2.589    CPU time    2.048    CPU 
utilization  79.12 %


        Children see throughput for 12 readers          = 4938124.12 kB/sec
        Parent sees throughput for 12 readers           = 4932862.08 kB/sec
        Min throughput per process                      =  408768.81 kB/sec
        Max throughput per process                      =  413879.25 kB/sec
        Avg throughput per process                      =  411510.34 kB/sec
        Min xfer                                        = 1036800.00 kB
        CPU utilization: Wall time    2.536    CPU time    1.906    CPU 
utilization  75.16 %


        Children see throughput for 12 re-readers       = 4992115.16 kB/sec
        Parent sees throughput for 12 re-readers        = 4986102.07 kB/sec
        Min throughput per process                      =  411103.00 kB/sec
        Max throughput per process                      =  420302.97 kB/sec
        Avg throughput per process                      =  416009.60 kB/sec
        Min xfer                                        = 1025792.00 kB
        CPU utilization: Wall time    2.497    CPU time    1.887    CPU 
utilization  75.57 %

NFS WRITE throughput improves significantly. NFS READ throughput
improves somewhat, but not to the degree it did with yesterday's
patch series.

function_graph shows a single intel_iommu_map() is used more
frequently, but the following happens on occasion:

This is because the pages are not physically contiguous, __iommu_map_sg
can't coalesce them.

If there's no full restoration with all four patches, it could be due to
ping-pongs between iommu core and the vendor iommu driver with indirect
calls. Hence a possible solution is to add an iommu_ops->map_sg() so
that all scatter gathered items could be handled in a single function as
before. This has already proposed by Isaac J. Manjarres.

https://lore.kernel.org/linux-iommu/1610376862-927-5-git-send-email-isa...@codeaurora.org/

Best regards,
baolu


395.678889: funcgraph_entry:                   |  dma_map_sg_attrs() {
395.678889: funcgraph_entry:                   |    iommu_dma_map_sg() {
395.678890: funcgraph_entry:        0.257 us   |      iommu_get_dma_domain();
395.678890: funcgraph_entry:        0.255 us   |      
iommu_dma_deferred_attach();
395.678891: funcgraph_entry:                   |      
iommu_dma_sync_sg_for_device() {
395.678891: funcgraph_entry:        0.253 us   |        dev_is_untrusted();
395.678891: funcgraph_exit:         0.773 us   |      }
395.678892: funcgraph_entry:        0.250 us   |      dev_is_untrusted();
395.678893: funcgraph_entry:                   |      iommu_dma_alloc_iova() {
395.678893: funcgraph_entry:                   |        alloc_iova_fast() {
395.678893: funcgraph_entry:        0.255 us   |          
_raw_spin_lock_irqsave();
395.678894: funcgraph_entry:        0.375 us   |          __lock_text_start();
395.678894: funcgraph_exit:         1.435 us   |        }
395.678895: funcgraph_exit:         2.002 us   |      }
395.678895: funcgraph_entry:        0.252 us   |      dma_info_to_prot();
395.678895: funcgraph_entry:                   |      iommu_map_sg_atomic() {
395.678896: funcgraph_entry:                   |        __iommu_map_sg() {
395.678896: funcgraph_entry:        1.675 us   |          intel_iommu_map();
395.678898: funcgraph_entry:        1.365 us   |          intel_iommu_map();
395.678900: funcgraph_entry:        1.373 us   |          intel_iommu_map();
395.678901: funcgraph_entry:        1.378 us   |          intel_iommu_map();
395.678903: funcgraph_entry:        1.380 us   |          intel_iommu_map();
395.678905: funcgraph_entry:        1.380 us   |          intel_iommu_map();
395.678906: funcgraph_entry:        1.378 us   |          intel_iommu_map();
395.678908: funcgraph_entry:        1.380 us   |          intel_iommu_map();
395.678910: funcgraph_entry:        1.345 us   |          intel_iommu_map();
395.678911: funcgraph_entry:        1.342 us   |          intel_iommu_map();
395.678913: funcgraph_entry:        1.342 us   |          intel_iommu_map();
395.678915: funcgraph_entry:        1.395 us   |          intel_iommu_map();
395.678916: funcgraph_entry:        1.343 us   |          intel_iommu_map();
395.678918: funcgraph_entry:        1.350 us   |          intel_iommu_map();
395.678920: funcgraph_entry:        1.395 us   |          intel_iommu_map();
395.678921: funcgraph_entry:        1.342 us   |          intel_iommu_map();
395.678923: funcgraph_entry:        1.350 us   |          intel_iommu_map();
395.678924: funcgraph_entry:        1.345 us   |          intel_iommu_map();
395.678926: funcgraph_entry:        1.345 us   |          intel_iommu_map();
395.678928: funcgraph_entry:        1.340 us   |          intel_iommu_map();
395.678929: funcgraph_entry:        1.342 us   |          intel_iommu_map();
395.678931: funcgraph_entry:        1.335 us   |          intel_iommu_map();
395.678933: funcgraph_entry:        1.345 us   |          intel_iommu_map();
395.678934: funcgraph_entry:        1.337 us   |          intel_iommu_map();
395.678936: funcgraph_entry:        1.305 us   |          intel_iommu_map();
395.678938: funcgraph_entry:        1.380 us   |          intel_iommu_map();
395.678939: funcgraph_entry:        1.365 us   |          intel_iommu_map();
395.678941: funcgraph_entry:        1.370 us   |          intel_iommu_map();
395.678943: funcgraph_entry:        1.365 us   |          intel_iommu_map();
395.678945: funcgraph_entry:        1.482 us   |          intel_iommu_map();
395.678946: funcgraph_exit:       + 50.753 us  |        }
395.678947: funcgraph_exit:       + 51.348 us  |      }
395.678947: funcgraph_exit:       + 57.975 us  |    }
395.678948: funcgraph_exit:       + 58.700 us  |  }
395.678953: xprtrdma_mr_map:      task:64127@5 mr.id=104 nents=30 
122880@0xc5e467fde9380000:0xc0011103 (TO_DEVICE)
395.678953: xprtrdma_chunk_read:  task:64127@5 pos=148 
122880@0xc5e467fde9380000:0xc0011103 (more)


--
Chuck Lever



_______________________________________________
iommu mailing list
iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/iommu

Reply via email to