Hi Baolu,
> From: Lu Baolu [mailto:baolu...@linux.intel.com]
> Sent: Monday, November 5, 2018 1:32 PM
[...]
> ---
> drivers/iommu/dmar.c | 83 +++++++++++++++++++----------
> drivers/iommu/intel-svm.c | 76 ++++++++++++++++----------
> drivers/iommu/intel_irq_remapping.c | 6 ++-
> include/linux/intel-iommu.h | 9 +++-
> 4 files changed, 115 insertions(+), 59 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/dmar.c b/drivers/iommu/dmar.c
> index d9c748b6f9e4..ec10427b98ac 100644
> --- a/drivers/iommu/dmar.c
> +++ b/drivers/iommu/dmar.c
> @@ -1160,6 +1160,7 @@ static int qi_check_fault(struct intel_iommu *iommu, int
> index)
> int head, tail;
> struct q_inval *qi = iommu->qi;
> int wait_index = (index + 1) % QI_LENGTH;
> + int shift = qi_shift(iommu);
>
> if (qi->desc_status[wait_index] == QI_ABORT)
> return -EAGAIN;
> @@ -1173,13 +1174,15 @@ static int qi_check_fault(struct intel_iommu *iommu,
> int index)
> */
> if (fault & DMA_FSTS_IQE) {
> head = readl(iommu->reg + DMAR_IQH_REG);
> - if ((head >> DMAR_IQ_SHIFT) == index) {
> + if ((head >> shift) == index) {
> + struct qi_desc *desc = qi->desc + head;
> +
> pr_err("VT-d detected invalid descriptor: "
> "low=%llx, high=%llx\n",
> - (unsigned long long)qi->desc[index].low,
> - (unsigned long long)qi->desc[index].high);
> - memcpy(&qi->desc[index], &qi->desc[wait_index],
> - sizeof(struct qi_desc));
> + (unsigned long long)desc->qw0,
> + (unsigned long long)desc->qw1);
Still missing qw2 and qw3. May make the print differ based on if smts is
configed.
> + memcpy(desc, qi->desc + (wait_index << shift),
Would "memcpy(desc, (unsigned long long) (qi->desc + (wait_index << shift)," be
more safe?
> + 1 << shift);
> writel(DMA_FSTS_IQE, iommu->reg + DMAR_FSTS_REG);
> return -EINVAL;
> }
> @@ -1191,10 +1194,10 @@ static int qi_check_fault(struct intel_iommu *iommu,
> int index)
> */
> if (fault & DMA_FSTS_ITE) {
> head = readl(iommu->reg + DMAR_IQH_REG);
> - head = ((head >> DMAR_IQ_SHIFT) - 1 + QI_LENGTH) % QI_LENGTH;
> + head = ((head >> shift) - 1 + QI_LENGTH) % QI_LENGTH;
> head |= 1;
> tail = readl(iommu->reg + DMAR_IQT_REG);
> - tail = ((tail >> DMAR_IQ_SHIFT) - 1 + QI_LENGTH) % QI_LENGTH;
> + tail = ((tail >> shift) - 1 + QI_LENGTH) % QI_LENGTH;
>
> writel(DMA_FSTS_ITE, iommu->reg + DMAR_FSTS_REG);
>
> @@ -1222,15 +1225,14 @@ int qi_submit_sync(struct qi_desc *desc, struct
> intel_iommu *iommu)
> {
> int rc;
> struct q_inval *qi = iommu->qi;
> - struct qi_desc *hw, wait_desc;
> + int offset, shift, length;
> + struct qi_desc wait_desc;
> int wait_index, index;
> unsigned long flags;
>
> if (!qi)
> return 0;
>
> - hw = qi->desc;
> -
> restart:
> rc = 0;
>
> @@ -1243,16 +1245,21 @@ int qi_submit_sync(struct qi_desc *desc, struct
> intel_iommu *iommu)
>
> index = qi->free_head;
> wait_index = (index + 1) % QI_LENGTH;
> + shift = qi_shift(iommu);
> + length = 1 << shift;
>
> qi->desc_status[index] = qi->desc_status[wait_index] = QI_IN_USE;
>
> - hw[index] = *desc;
> -
> - wait_desc.low = QI_IWD_STATUS_DATA(QI_DONE) |
> + offset = index << shift;
> + memcpy(qi->desc + offset, desc, length);
> + wait_desc.qw0 = QI_IWD_STATUS_DATA(QI_DONE) |
> QI_IWD_STATUS_WRITE | QI_IWD_TYPE;
> - wait_desc.high = virt_to_phys(&qi->desc_status[wait_index]);
> + wait_desc.qw1 = virt_to_phys(&qi->desc_status[wait_index]);
> + wait_desc.qw2 = 0;
> + wait_desc.qw3 = 0;
>
> - hw[wait_index] = wait_desc;
> + offset = wait_index << shift;
> + memcpy(qi->desc + offset, &wait_desc, length);
same question with above one.
Thanks,
Yi Liu
_______________________________________________
iommu mailing list
iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/iommu
