Hi Robin, >-----Original Message----- >From: linux-arm-msm-ow...@vger.kernel.org >[mailto:linux-arm-msm-ow...@vger.kernel.org] On Behalf Of Robin Murphy >Sent: Thursday, January 19, 2017 11:28 PM >To: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieral...@arm.com>; Sricharan R ><sricha...@codeaurora.org> >Cc: will.dea...@arm.com; j...@8bytes.org; iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org; >linux-arm-ker...@lists.infradead.org; linux-arm- >m...@vger.kernel.org; m.szyprow...@samsung.com >Subject: Re: [PATCH V5 08/12] iommu/arm-smmu: Clean up early-probing >workarounds > >On 19/01/17 16:50, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote: >> On Thu, Jan 19, 2017 at 08:35:52PM +0530, Sricharan R wrote: >>> From: Robin Murphy <robin.mur...@arm.com> >>> >>> Now that the appropriate ordering is enforced via profe-deferral of >>> masters in core code, rip it all out and bask in the simplicity. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Robin Murphy <robin.mur...@arm.com> >>> [Sricharan: Rebased on top of ACPI IORT SMMU series] >>> Signed-off-by: Sricharan R <sricha...@codeaurora.org> >>> --- >>> * No change >> >> Well, a tad too early on the series for ACPI, aka if we bisect the >> series here you would break ACPI. >> >> Totally agree on the patch, but you should move it to the end of the >> series. > >Indeed - I think a more appropriate ordering of the current patch >numbers would be: > >1, 2, 3, 4, 9, 5+10 (squashed), 6, 11, 7, 8, 12 >
Ok, will repost with this order. Regards, Sricharan _______________________________________________ iommu mailing list iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/iommu
