On 09/01/15 19:45, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
On Friday 09 January 2015 16:56:03 Robin Murphy wrote:
This one's a bit tricky to find a home for - I think technically it's
probably an IOMMU patch, but then the long-underlying problem doesn't
seem to have blown up anything until arm64, and my motivation is to
make bits of Juno work, which seems to nudge it towards arm64/arm-soc
territory. Could anyone suggest which tree is most appropriate?
I have a set of patches touching various dma-mapping.h related bits
across architectures and in ARM in particular. Your patch fits into
that series, and I guess we could either have it in my asm-generic
tree or in Andrew Morton's mm tree. Possibly also arm-soc for practical
reasons, although it really doesn't belong in there.
Thanks Arnd, I'd agree asm-generic or mm sound the most sensible - If
you're happy to carry this patch with your series that'd be really helpful.
Robin.
_______________________________________________
iommu mailing list
iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/iommu
