On Fri, Jan 09, 2015 at 07:45:49PM +0000, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > On Friday 09 January 2015 16:56:03 Robin Murphy wrote: > > > > This one's a bit tricky to find a home for - I think technically it's > > probably an IOMMU patch, but then the long-underlying problem doesn't > > seem to have blown up anything until arm64, and my motivation is to > > make bits of Juno work, which seems to nudge it towards arm64/arm-soc > > territory. Could anyone suggest which tree is most appropriate? > > I have a set of patches touching various dma-mapping.h related bits > across architectures and in ARM in particular. Your patch fits into > that series, and I guess we could either have it in my asm-generic > tree or in Andrew Morton's mm tree. Possibly also arm-soc for practical > reasons, although it really doesn't belong in there.
I also have a couple of fixes for issues found by Laurent for tearing down the IOMMU dma ops, so you could include those too. I'll send them out this afternoon. Will _______________________________________________ iommu mailing list iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/iommu
