On Tue, Aug 20, 2019 at 7:51 AM G. P. B. <george.bany...@gmail.com> wrote:
> - I seriously don't appreciate that the RFC has been edited *WITHOUT* my > knowledge to add endorsement names on the counterargument to the RFC on the > RFC itself when the appropriate place would have been the counter argument > document. > > This has been a topic of discussion in the past. The agreement was that non-author edits are permitted if they are isolated to a clear "counter-arguments" section. If someone had changed the meaning of the RFC or of your arguments in favor of it that would be another story, but that's not what happened here. -Sara
