> This does not explain how someone could use that feature *by accident*. I gave > an example where you can use short open tags by accident, and it is really > easy > (the most popular IDE sometimes generates code with short open tags) and hard > to notice (it is not easy to spot a difference between `<?` and `<?php`). How > can > you compare this to situation when you create a separate file with an explicit > directive to disable PHP engine, and then be surprised that code is not > executed?
Disabling short tags now is done with "an explicit directive" (there has to be a specific ini file with a specific setting 'short_open_tag = 0'). Isn't this the same "situation when you create a separate file with an explicit directive"? If a coder (or IDE) has written '<?', '<%' or by accident any other tag unless tested the effect (a part of code not being parsed/executed) will be exactly the same if the feature suddenly disappeared (unless the additional checks in the 'v2 RFC' which on the other hand would make the engine a tiny bit slower but probably have to be implemented to avoid such accidents). rr -- PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
